Voices in Oise, France

A witness reported in 2012 an observation made between July and August 1990 (the date of July 1, 1990 is given arbitrarily, the witness not remembering exactly the day's date). This person also links to this first observation a particular event that happened in 2005. As a teenager, the witness observed the stars with her brother from the bedroom of the family home around half past midnight. Both noticed that a bright point was approaching and that a gigantic, black, and silent device stabilized in front of the house. The children heard voices and, frightened, hid under a desk until the craft left. It was 2:30 a.m. when they came out of their hiding place, surprised to have stayed hidden for so long. During a night in 2005, the main witness, waking up very agitated, remembered that during the very long time she and her brother were hidden, she had gone aboard the craft. She had found herself surrounded by six beings discussing among themselves about her and that she was completely terrified. The witness suddenly found herself under the desk in the bedroom of the house. The witness reported a UAP observation in 1990, then a strange encounter in 2005. The account of both cases was provided for expert analysis to a researcher from the University of Toulouse, a member of a CNRS laboratory, a specialist in eyewitness testimony. The result of this expert analysis concludes that the beginning of the first observation was really experienced by the witness (the beginning of the testimony suggests a satellite pass); however, the age of the observation as well as the lack of information (the date, the time) do not allow reaching a clear conclusion. The second experience is more recent but the conclusions highlight strong indicators of non-experienced accounts, which is called "false memory," that is, memories adopted by the witness in all sincerity, but resulting from an involuntary construction on the part of the witness. The appearance of false memories can occur in witnesses who have experienced a state of post-traumatic stress (in this case, the witness retains a traumatic memory of the first experience with repercussions on her state of health (memory disorder). This case is classified "C": not exploitable due to lack of precise information.