On October 31, 2017 at 6:05 PM, three witnesses in a garden are astonished to see a bright point due east. The witnesses then notice the presence of three white lights that seem to be at eac…
both described photographed · in the same place
Hautes-Pyrénées, France · 2017-05-22 · from the GEIPAN archive
On May 22, 2017 at around 9:45 PM, a witness observed from his window, looking toward Tarbes, an orange trail in the sky. He thought it was an airplane trail, but the thickness and especially the curve described intrigued him: the witness then thought of an airplane in difficulty. The witness took a series of photographs and contacted two gendarmerie stations. No other testimony was collected. Analysis of the photograph and of the oddities noted by the witness (width and dissipation time of the trail) leads to establishing a hypothesis of an airplane performing a fuel dump (see the investigation report). These same analyses make it possible to establish scenarios for the airplane's position and speed. The commercial airliner hypothesis cannot be retained because such an airplane should have been found on public aircraft tracking sites, and especially because such a fuel dump operation corresponds to a flight diversion and should have left a trace. On the other hand, in the case of a military aircraft, it is normal that it does not appear in public records, nor in the CNOA radar data, because that data had been collected over too short a distance and can no longer be obtained after a two-month period. The CNOA could not provide an operational record of the fuel dump; however, the search was too late (after the investigation time needed to point toward the hypothesis) to be able to conduct it across all squadrons in France. Moreover, such an operation did not necessarily get recorded, because it is not always a critical operation in the case of a military aircraft. In this context, the absence of a record of a military aircraft and of a fuel dump operation does not invalidate the hypothesis, which should therefore be retained due to the strong consistency of the visual aspects (witness and photo) and of possible trajectory reconstructions (photo analysis). The consistency is good, with a precise testimony and photos that could be exploited. Consequently, GEIPAN classifies the case as B: probable observation of a kerosene dump by a military aircraft, occurring at high altitude (presumably to limit environmental impacts on the population).
What stood out: photographed
On October 31, 2017 at 6:05 PM, three witnesses in a garden are astonished to see a bright point due east. The witnesses then notice the presence of three white lights that seem to be at eac…
both described photographed · in the same place
On April 17, 2018 at 9:00 PM, a witness is taking a long-exposure photo of the sky pointed at the zenith between the Big Dipper and Leo when he notices a trail that he takes for an ordinary …
both described photographed · 71 km away
On August 3, 2016 at 11:06 PM, a witness and his partner observe the slow and silent movement of two luminous objects (sunflower yellow) that follow each other. One of the witnesses takes a …
both described photographed · 88 km away
Following a press article, GEIPAN decided to investigate an observation made on June 23, 2008, at 4:52 a.m. by a witness who took photographs of a luminous phenomenon in the sky. According t…
both described photographed · 88 km away
Around 7 p.m. in the evening of June 3 or 4, 2009 (the witness does not remember the exact date), a photography enthusiast takes a photo of the sky in which one can see the Moon and the whit…
both described photographed · 88 km away
On March 17, 2010, at around 8:40 p.m., a motorist observed an orange luminous phenomenon that intrigued him just above the horizon. He stopped and took photographs facing west just before t…
both described photographed · 88 km away
On January 17, 2013 at 5:30 a.m., a female driver's attention was drawn to the presence above the road of a large rectangular object with green and red lights. The witness slowed down and to…
the accounts read alike, found by meaning rather than by shared details
On January 18, 2017 at around 10:10 a.m., a witness observed for 15 seconds from his window two intermittent trails of gray smoke in the clear sky. The witness is intrigued by these unusual …
the accounts read alike, found by meaning rather than by shared details
On July 26, 2016 at around 7:14 p.m., a witness on their outdoor terrace observed the rapid and silent movement of a spherical object surrounded by a ring, coming from the North-Northeast. T…
the accounts read alike, found by meaning rather than by shared details
There are thousands more like this in the record. Open one at random, or read the ones the most people recognise.
Read anotherMost recognisedOr if something like this happened to you, write it down and we will look for the others who saw it too.
If this reminds you of something a friend or a relative told you once and never mentioned again, send them this page. Reading that a stranger described the same thing is usually the part that helps.
Nothing is tracked back to you and nothing is sent on your behalf. The link is just the page you are reading.
This is an official case file of GEIPAN, the French space agency's unidentified aerospace phenomena office, machine translated from French. The original text and the full investigation file are at geipan.fr. We reproduce it with thanks and remove anything on request.