An open record of things people cannot explain

Place withheld · 1884-01-01 · from the PHANTASMS archive

An account

Mrs. Harnett is in delicate health, and I should not like to trouble her. When I spoke to her about it, she remembered the incident. The strength of this narrative, of course, lies in the third case, where the correspondence of day was made out to be exact. The ciw wi^^ hypothesis that the call on this occasion was a real call outside the house, though repudiated by Mrs. Wight, cannot be so confidently rejected by those who realise the difficulty of localising sounds with precision. Still, the fact of her having on other occasions experienced impressions of exactly this form — the commonest of all forms of sensory hallucination — distinctly supports the view that the experi- ''-^ *^ ^ ence was hallucinatory ; and if so, the coincidence of day is a strong -'/^ '-*«^'^ point in favour of the telepathic explanation. I will not pause here ' -y **^ on the fact that in this instance there was a second percipient, as d^o v»-<^-'«- < that topic will be fully discussed in the chapter on Collective sfenii^---^ Cases. f '■ ^^ .

 

Keep reading

There are thousands more like this in the record. Open one at random, or read the ones the most people recognise.

Read anotherMost recognised

Or if something like this happened to you, write it down and we will look for the others who saw it too.

Know someone this happened to?

If this reminds you of something a friend or a relative told you once and never mentioned again, send them this page. Reading that a stranger described the same thing is usually the part that helps.

By emailBy text

Nothing is tracked back to you and nothing is sent on your behalf. The link is just the page you are reading.

This is a witness statement collected in the 1880s by Edmund Gurney, Frederic Myers and Frank Podmore of the Society for Psychical Research, and published in Phantasms of the Living (1886), the first large scientific collection of such testimony. Witnesses signed their statements and were often corroborated by others, whose statements appear as their own accounts. The book is in the public domain; the text is verbatim save for scanning artifacts, and the full volumes are at archive.org.