An open record of things people cannot explain

Place withheld · 1886-01-01 · from the PHANTASMS archive

An account

So far as I can remember, my father was still delii'ious at the time he said he had gone to see me. I told no one of the experience at the time, for I was living by myself. I have never, that I can recollect, had any other experience of the kind, and am not subject to any ' hallucination of the senses.' I am bound in fairness to tell you that I am an entire disbeliever in the supernaturalness of such experiences. This infidelity may be due to my never having heard of any such experiences which could not be explained on the coincidence principle. [Mr. Lindesay is of course right in his disbelief of the supernaturalness of such phenomena; but it has not struck him that the 462 SUPPLEMENT. [chap. alternative to supposing them supernatural is not necessarily to suppose them accidental. His concluding comment reproduces the remarks of Lord Brougham, as to which see Vol. I., pp. 396-7. I need hardly point out again that every isolated case of coincidence might be accidental, and that the argument for telepathy is essentially cumulative. This case may perhaps have been reciprocal ; but we clearly have no proof that the father's experience was anything more than a purely subjective impression or dream.] (500) From a lady occupying a responsible position, which obliges her, out of regard to others, to withhold her name from publication. Her viva voce account, given to me in the room where the experience occurred, made it almost certain that she was in a state of normal wakefulness at the time ; still, as she had been in bed for some little time, I have placed the case in this chapter rather than the next. '< ]yfay 2nd, 1886. On the night of the 18th December, 1872, I had retired to bed about 11 o'clock. The bed, I may mention, is so placed that any person entering the room, must pass quite round it before reaching the side on which I lay. I had perhaps been in bed 20 minutes, and had been thinking over the events of the evening, a pupils' concert, when suddenly I saw my husband by the door ; he moved swiftly round the bed till he came close to me, when he as suddenly disappeared. So astonished was T, that involuntarily I called him by name. The gas was alight, as usual, in the room ; and as I knew that I had not been asleep, and had not heard a sound to alarm me, I had not a doubt, any more than I have at this moment, that the vision was that of my absent husband. On the 30th December of the same year, I received a letter by the Australian mail, from a gentleman, telling me that my husband had met with a serio

 

Others who described something like this

1886-11-01

I was so impressed by the account on p. 105, that I determined to put the matter to an experiment. Retiring at 10.45, I determined to appear, if possible, to [a friend], and accordingly I se

the accounts read alike, found by meaning rather than by shared details

1884-09-01

September 15th, 1884. The narrative has often been told by me in my wife's presence, and there can be no discrepancy or doubt. It is a true and circumstantial account of what happened, about

the accounts read alike, found by meaning rather than by shared details

1885-12-01

I had spent the evening of December 5th in close study at Greek grammar. About 11 o'clock I stopped, and sat down by the fire to read Manon Lescaut. Some time afterwards I fell asleep, and i

the accounts read alike, found by meaning rather than by shared details

Keep reading

There are thousands more like this in the record. Open one at random, or read the ones the most people recognise.

Read anotherMost recognised

Or if something like this happened to you, write it down and we will look for the others who saw it too.

Know someone this happened to?

If this reminds you of something a friend or a relative told you once and never mentioned again, send them this page. Reading that a stranger described the same thing is usually the part that helps.

By emailBy text

Nothing is tracked back to you and nothing is sent on your behalf. The link is just the page you are reading.

This is a witness statement collected in the 1880s by Edmund Gurney, Frederic Myers and Frank Podmore of the Society for Psychical Research, and published in Phantasms of the Living (1886), the first large scientific collection of such testimony. Witnesses signed their statements and were often corroborated by others, whose statements appear as their own accounts. The book is in the public domain; the text is verbatim save for scanning artifacts, and the full volumes are at archive.org.