GEIPAN continues to publish all of its archives on its public website www.geipan.fr. Among its publications are old cases classified at the time (A, B, C, or D) that are now being re-examine…
both described moving in formation
Alpes-Maritimes, France · 1981-12-19 · from the GEIPAN archive
GEIPAN continues to publish all of its archives on its public website www.geipan.fr. Among its publications are old cases classified at the time (A, B, C, or D) which are now being re-examined, for the sole purpose of being more relevant in the conclusions. Thanks to new technical means (software) and the investigation experience acquired over all these recent years, this re-examination sometimes leads to new remarks or even a change of classification explained in an investigation note. This observation case, previously classified D and named NICE (06) 1981, is part of a set of cases recently re-examined. On Saturday, December 19, 1981, between 10:30 a.m. and 10:50 a.m., several witnesses observed between 50 and 100 flying objects very high in the sky. Most of these objects were round in shape, white and shiny; they moved in the direction of the Southwest in a single formation with an unequal distance between each object. Their speed was slow and they made no noise. The last three objects had a different shape, like a sort of tube. These changed color, passing alternately from white to orange. These objects disappeared, hidden by the landscape and the clouds. Two witnesses filed a report with the gendarmerie. The description of the UAP(s) made by the witnesses strongly recalls a group release of balloons (see investigation notes). It should be noted that the observation took place on a Saturday morning, the last day of school before the Christmas holidays of 1981. One week before the Christmas festivities, the observation could thus be explained by a massive release of balloons with letters written by students. The indicated trajectory from NE to SW seems reliable, because the witnesses indicate the same direction and saw the UAPs pass near their vertical (which favors the assessment of the direction of movement). This direction is not exactly that of the wind, which is from North to South. But it is noted: - that the wind is measured at sea level while the possible balloons were moving 6 km away and at more than 100 m altitude (given their small appearance) and perhaps even higher, since presumably launched from the heights of Nice, - that one is in the city and near the mountains (factors favoring local variabilities). These are all elements that can explain that the wind at the UAP level had a direction different by 40° from that measured at the Nice station. Note moreover that the wind measured from 12:00 was from East to West and that it could therefore have begun to turn a little earlier at the altitude of the UAPs. Furthermore, the slowness and the travel time of the objects composing the UAP are consistent with a weak wind measured at around 7 km/h. The appearance of the colors and glows of the UAPs varies depending on the witnesses. T2 retains different colors among the round-shaped UAPs and different colors (yellow-green-red-blue); T1 retains a "bright white color giving a reflection resembling that of a light on an aluminum plate." These two descriptions are compatible with balloons of presumably different colors and strongly reflecting the sun (the sun-balloons-witnesses geometry is favorable to the reflection). T1 distinguishes different UAPs (at the end of the formation). The shape is no longer round but that of tubes, and the color of each of them alternates between orange and white. This can be explained by the introduction into this release, massively composed of round balloons, of a few more complex balloons, cylindrical, with two faces and of different colors. Note that T2 did not distinguish UAPs different from the others, apart from the fact that "over the whole there were some that lit up and went out." On this last point, the combination of the two testimonies is explained by a shape of (some) balloons that is not symmetrical, favoring spinning and therefore the variation of reflection or color depending on the reality of the balloons or depending on the particularities and precision of perception of the witnesses. Consequently, GEIPAN classifies the case as B: probable observation of festive balloons (party balloons).
What stood out: moving in formation
GEIPAN continues to publish all of its archives on its public website www.geipan.fr. Among its publications are old cases classified at the time (A, B, C, or D) that are now being re-examine…
both described moving in formation
On May 10, 1981, witnesses saw an unusual luminous phenomenon around 8:30 p.m. A red ball high in the sky seemed to descend slowly and land. Suddenly an intense light burst from a triangle, …
both described moving in formation
On Saturday, August 6, 2016 at 11:05 PM, a couple in a garden observes the sky and sees appear, to the south-southwest above a nearby building, 4 luminous points flying silently in formation…
both described moving in formation
On February 6, 2017 at around 8:45 PM, a female driver noticed a very intense light in the sky. When she got home, the witness continued to see this light, stationary. She observed it with b…
both described moving in formation
While making an evening Hunt for Elk in the area of Guler MT. One of my routes intersected with the Monte Cristo Trail aprox 2.5 SE of its head at the 080 spur rd. Following the Trail NW, I …
both described moving in formation
The gendarmerie was informed via the press that several people had observed a luminous phenomenon in the sky several times in a row. The witnesses' descriptions vary as to the very descripti…
both described moving in formation
Write it down while you still remember the details. We will look for the others.
Tell us what you sawIf this reminds you of something a friend or a relative told you once and never mentioned again, send them this page. Reading that a stranger described the same thing is usually the part that helps.
Nothing is tracked back to you and nothing is sent on your behalf. The link is just the page you are reading.
This is an official case file of GEIPAN, the French space agency's unidentified aerospace phenomena office, machine translated from French. The original text and the full investigation file are at geipan.fr. We reproduce it with thanks and remove anything on request.