An open record of things people cannot explain

Haut-Rhin, France · 1983-04-24 · from the GEIPAN archive

An account in Haut-Rhin, France

At the initiative of a GEIPAN investigator, the case previously named LAPOUTROIE (68) 24.04.1983 was studied again in 2013. Thanks to new technical means (software) and the investigative experience acquired over all these recent years, this re-examination sometimes leads to new remarks or even a change of classification explained in a document (see Investigation Notes). On April 24, 1983 at exactly 10:20 PM, two witnesses saw above a mountain range a luminous object the size of a tennis ball. During the naked-eye observation, the object seemed slightly ovoid, static with occasional slight oscillations. It was surrounded by a halo of white light. The object then descended in three successive stages, which caused a change in color. One of the people, equipped with a pair of binoculars, observed a sphere taller than it was wide with very bright veins on the object. It disappeared into the landscape during its descent. The new investigation shows that the UAP was exactly at the location of Venus. The sky being described by the witnesses as starry and cloudless, it is not possible that they would not have mentioned Venus next to the UAP if the latter were not Venus. The Gendarmerie investigation had rejected the hypothesis of a possible astronomical misidentification (a poor transmission of information concerning the position of Venus at the time of the observation seems to have occurred between the Gendarmerie and the astronomical observatory contacted). The credibility of the witnesses is not in question, and moreover they were misled by a particular phenomenon of perception disturbance (see the investigation notes). This case is classified "A": astronomical observation of Venus.

 

Others who described something like this

1983-05-09

In its publications, there are old cases classified at the time as type "C" cases which are now being re-examined, with the sole aim of being more relevant in the conclusions. Thanks to new …

the accounts read alike, found by meaning rather than by shared details

1979-01-14

This observation case is one of the cases classified as "C" in 2008 by GEIPAN. It was the subject of a new investigation. (see the document: Investigation notes). On January 14, 1979 between…

the accounts read alike, found by meaning rather than by shared details

1977-02-05

This observation case, classified "C" by GEPAN, is now part of a re-examination (see the document Investigation Notes). On February 5, 1977, between 9:00 PM and 9:30 PM, two people in Reims …

the accounts read alike, found by meaning rather than by shared details

Keep reading

There are thousands more like this in the record. Open one at random, or read the ones the most people recognise.

Read anotherMost recognised

Or if something like this happened to you, write it down and we will look for the others who saw it too.

Know someone this happened to?

If this reminds you of something a friend or a relative told you once and never mentioned again, send them this page. Reading that a stranger described the same thing is usually the part that helps.

By emailBy text

Nothing is tracked back to you and nothing is sent on your behalf. The link is just the page you are reading.

This is an official case file of GEIPAN, the French space agency's unidentified aerospace phenomena office, machine translated from French. The original text and the full investigation file are at geipan.fr. We reproduce it with thanks and remove anything on request.